Legal Opinion

Consmiller v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 27, 1912No. 683PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 25578 (T. D. 31589).

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

This case involves the tariff classification of marble mantel pieces which were imported at the port of New York and assessed for duty by the collector of customs as manufactures of marble under the provisions of paragraph 112 of the tariff act of 1909, which said paragraph reads as follows:

112. Marble, breccia, onyx, alabaster, and jet, wholly or partly manufactured into monuments, benches, vases, and other articles, or of which these substances or either of them is the component material of chief value, and all articles composed wholly or in chief value of agate, rock crystal, or other…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. United States v. OlivottiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  3. United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. Downing v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. United States v. DiederichCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API