Legal Opinion

Vreeland v. New Jersey Stone Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1878PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On final hearing on bill, supplemental bill, answer to supplemental bill, replication and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Yice-Chancellor.

This suit is brought against the New Jersey Stone Company and six natural persons. These six defendants, with the complainant, constitute all the proprietaries of the corporate defendant. Its object is to set aside the complainant’s contract to take one hundred shares of the capital stock of the corporation, and also to recover the amount he has paid under it, on the ground that he was induced to enter into it by willful misrepresentation.

Nor that the company failed to acquire all of the land specified in its prospectus. Kelsey v. Northern Light Co., 54 Barb. (N. Y.) 111.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Buffalo and N.Y. City R.R. Co. v. . DudleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Andrews v. Ohio & Mississippi RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Johnson v. Crawfordsville, Frankfort, Kokomo, & Fort Wayne RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Litchfield Bank v. ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
  5. Walker v. Mobile & Ohio RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1857

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allen v. v. AND a BROS., INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  2. Kugler v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  3. Monsanto Co. v. Alden Leeds, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  4. Commercial Ins. Co. of Newark v. ApgarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  5. Pearlman v. KrasnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API