Legal Opinion · Dissent

Management Group, LLC v. Coosa Cable Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 2011No. 1091505Published

1DissentMurdock, Justice

It would be hard to dispute that the holding of our Court today yields a scheme that, at best, must be considered awkward: A defendant who persuades an appellate court to reverse a permanent injunction will be able to recover “damages” incurred during the relatively brief period at the outset of the litigation during which a preliminary injunction may have been in place (a period sometimes lasting only a few weeks), but will not be able to recover damages for the often much longer period (often extending for many months (11 months in this case)) between the entry of a permanent injunction and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Buddy Systems, Inc., a California Corporation v. Exer-Genie, Inc., a Corporation, and E. E. HolkesvickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API