Management Group, LLC v. Coosa Cable Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentMurdock, Justice
It would be hard to dispute that the holding of our Court today yields a scheme that, at best, must be considered awkward: A defendant who persuades an appellate court to reverse a permanent injunction will be able to recover “damages” incurred during the relatively brief period at the outset of the litigation during which a preliminary injunction may have been in place (a period sometimes lasting only a few weeks), but will not be able to recover damages for the often much longer period (often extending for many months (11 months in this case)) between the entry of a permanent injunction and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Piambino v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Buddy Systems, Inc., a California Corporation v. Exer-Genie, Inc., a Corporation, and E. E. HolkesvickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.