Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Orr

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2002No. 02-451PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 Three daughters of the decedent Everett Orr filed timely creditor’s claims against their father’s Estate claiming a right to be repaid for personal care services provided prior to their father’s death. The Estate denied their claims as did the District Court. The daughters appeal. We affirm.

ISSUE

¶2 The sole issue before this Court is whether the District Court erred in finding there was no agreement between the Claimant daughters and the decedent, whereby they would be compensated for the personal care services they provided to their father prior to his death.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

¶3 Everett…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reynolds' Adm'r v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  2. Donnes v. OrlandoMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. In Re the Estate of KuraltMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Neumann v. RogstadMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. In Re the Estate of HallMontana Supreme Court · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of BraatenMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of GilroyMontana Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API