Legal Opinion

DUPLESSE v. County of Los Angeles

District Court, C.D. California

Decided May 18, 2010No. CV 08-5819 AHM (FMOx)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS

(No Proceedings Held)

A. HOWARD MATZ, District Judge.

Stephen Montes, Deputy Clerk.

Plaintiffs Richard Duplesse and Tom Fahrny (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) brought this case as a collective action pursuant to section 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). Plaintiffs, who are fire fighters employed by the County of Los Angeles (“County”), allege that the County is violating the FLSA by failing to pay them overtime compensation at one and one-half times the “regular rate of pay” as defined by the FLSA. Specifically, they allege that the County…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Terri Gibson v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
  2. Vazquez v. TWC Administration LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API