Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. Armour Leather Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1940No. Appeal, 282PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The claimant-appellant in this workmen’s compensation case alleges in his assignments that the court below erred in sustaining his employer’s exceptions to the action of the referee and board in setting aside a final receipt and directing the resumption of payments under an open agreement for compensation for total disability. This appeal is from the judgment entered in favor of the defendant employer.

It is not controverted that claimant, twenty-nine years of age, more than six feet in height, weighing 220 pounds and in good health, sustained an injury by an accident…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Graham v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Gardner v. Pressed Steel Car Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. McKissick v. Penn Brook Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Reichner v. P. Blakiston's Son & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Dobash v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ruby v. HutchisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API