Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Steel Export Corp. v. Redondo Construction Corp.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 3, 1998No. 97-1738PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TORRUELLA, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Bethlehem Steel Export Corporation (“Bethlehem”) seeks to recover on a construction payment bond executed by defendants Redondo Construction Corporation (“Redondo”) and its surety, American International Insurance Company of Puerto Rico (“American International”), pursuant to Law 388, P.R. Laws Ann. tit. 22, § 47 et seq., which requires every public works contractor to post a bond to secure the payment of materials used by the general contractor and subcontractors.

Redondo, the principal contractor for the construction of a portion of the Expreso de Diego, P.R.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perez Ruiz v. Crespo GuillenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  2. Pine Tree Medical Associates v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  3. Northeast Utilities Service Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Tang v. Rhode Island Department of Elderly AffairsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. Geffon v. Micrion CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  3. Elizabeth Curran v. Ho Sung Kwon, Also Known as Alex Kwon, Revlon International Corporation, Jeremy Foster-FellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. William H. Brady v. The Credit Recovery Company, Inc. And Leslie A. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  5. Aycock Engineering, Inc. v. Airflite, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API