Rawles v. Perkey
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Panola.' Tried below before the Hon. 'A. J. Booty. So far as acted on by the court, the opinion sets out the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
Bonner, Associate Justice.
The substantial facts in this case, as shown by the record, are, that on February 28,1871, the defendant in error, S. P. Perkey, as executor of S. H. Perkey, deceased, sold to John W. Hewitt an interest in the Eoy Alford survey of land in Hill county, and made him a deed thereto, reciting the consideration of §2,556 to have-been in hand paid, and which deed was certified to have been duly recorded in the county of Hill on July 1, 1871; that Hewitt executed his note therefor for §2,556, payable at eighteen months after date; that on Hovember 20, 1874, Hewitt sold the…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Russell & Seisfeld v. KirkbrideTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Holt v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Houston v. DicksonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- McGranahan Lumber Co. v. Pyramid Asbestos & Roofing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Thelander v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.