Legal Opinion
Kirby v. Kirby
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 29, 1942No. File No. 8566PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, P.J.
This case comes before the court upon stipulated facts, as follows:
“2. The defendant, Western Surety Company, is a corporation, duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of South Dakota, and among other things authorized to act as Trustee of the Estate of Joe Kirby, deceased.
“3. The plaintiffs are heirs of Joe Kirby, deceased, and the defendant, Western Surety Company, is Trustee of the Estate of Joe Kirby, deceased, appointed by his Last Will, which has been duly probated in the County Court of Min-nehaha County, South Dakota.
“4. That there are no creditors of said Trust or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Gibbons v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Minot v. PaineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norvell EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Hopkins v. Cleveland Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1955
- Norvell EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964