Kirincich v. Standard Dredging Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
We think it fair to say that the resolvement of the case at bar depends upon the judicial stigmatism of the court deciding it. The learned district judge and ourselves are required to appraise facts in relation to, first, causation and, second, a standard of care. Our appraisal happens to differ with his and we find the same difference elsewhere in the “books”. It is an application of facts to a point of view. We should begin, therefore, with a statement of those facts.
Libelant’s intestate was a deck-hand employed on the dredge of the respondent. That dredge was, at the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Zinnel v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Harris v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- Sporsem v. First National Bank of PoulsboWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Sowles v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1893
- Ford v. Trident Fisheries Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Thompson v. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Stella Reyes, Administratrix of the Estate of Florentino Reyes, Deceased v. Vantage Steamship Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Allen v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1984
- Trahan v. Gulf Crews, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- Gardner v. National Bulk Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.