Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1984No. 83-699PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 4905.02 provides:

“As used in Chapter 4905. of the Revised Code, ‘public utility’ includes every * * * company, * * * defined in Section 4905.03 of the Revised Code, including all telephone companies, but excepting * * *, such * * * public utilities as are owned or operated by any municipal corporation * * (Emphasis added.)

According to this definition, a municipally owned utility is not a public utility for purposes of R.C. Chapter 4905.

R.C. 4905.71 reads in pertinent part as follows:

“(A) Every telephone, telegraph, or electric light company, which is a public utility as defined by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Canton v. Imperial Bowling Lanes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Dougherty v. TorrenceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Local 82, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  5. City of Piqua v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. StoverOhio Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API