Legal Opinion

State v. Pennell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 29, 1950No. 291PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

While defendant presents on this appeal many assignments of error based upon exceptions, taken during the course of the trial below, to rulings of the court in respect of admission and exclusion of evidence, and motions to nonsuit, and to the charge of the court to the jury, and to failure of the court to charge in certain aspects, it is deemed necessary to treat of only four of them, Nos. 21, 23, 25 and 28, that point out error which entitles defendant to a new trial. See S. v. Grant, 228 N.C. 522, 46 S.E. 2d 318, and cases cited.

The first three of the above numbered assignments of error…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. State v. . BrysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. . SpruillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. State v. . RoddeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. FrancisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. State v. HardeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API