Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Overland Automobile Co. of Dallas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 30, 1924No. 102PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.

Appellee filed suit against appellant to recover on a note for $200 and to foreclose a mortgage lien against an automobile which it had sold appellee, alleging the value of the automobile at $500. Appellant answered, admitting the execution of the note and mortgage, and by way of cross-action alleged that the automobile at the time he purchased same was secondhand, that appellee had made certain false representations to him with reference to the condition of the automobile, and that it had cost him $195.41 to have said car repaired and put in condition, giving ,an itemized statement thereof,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trammell v. RosenTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hermann v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Davies v. ThomsonTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Crain v. National Life Insurance Co. of the United StatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API