Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Johnston
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Motion for Rehearing.
Appellant in its motion for rehearing strenuously insists that there is fundamental error apparent of record because the judgment of the trial court is not a final judgment, in that it fails to specifically dispose of its cross-action against its codefendant, E. W. Jarman. The record in this case reveals that appellee Johnston brought this suit against appellant and against E. W. Jarman, L. A. Smith, W. C. Guyler, H. H. Groneman, and O. A. Groneman for $308. None of the defendants except appellee were, served with citation. E. W. Jarman waived the issuance of citation,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trammell v. RosenTexas Supreme Court · 1913
- Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. Village Mills Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Moody v. SmootTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Southern Pac. Co. v. UlmerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Tennison v. DoniganTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.