Legal Opinion

Rice v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1932Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing

(17 P. (2d) 562)

BELT, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by reason of the joint negligence of the defendants City of Portland and the MacMarr Stores, Inc. It arose out of the following facts which are, in view of motion for directed verdict, stated in the light most favorable to plaintiff:

On November 21, 1929, at about 5 o’clock p. m., a city truck used by the bureau of water works for emergency repair work was proceeding north on East Third street. The passengers on this car consisted of three members of the emergency…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. Webster & WebsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Stout v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Monnet v. UllmanOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Rosenbaum v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Finnegan v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API