Legal Opinion

Sheffield v. Beckwith

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 13, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action to recover damages for alienating the affections of the plaintiff’s wife, brought to the Superior Court in New London County and tried to the jury before Bennett, J.; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff for $1,750, and appeal by the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

The complaint is in two counts, one charging seduction and criminal conversation, and the other alienation of affections. The jury found for the defendant on the first count and for the plaintiff on the second count, assessing the damages at $1,750.

In the course of the trial the plaintiff’s wife, while testifying in behalf of the defendant in reference to her relations with her husband before the alleged alienation, was asked: “Now, subsequent to this time [December, 1909], were reports coming to you of his relations with still other women?” The question was at first excluded, but after some…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scholfield Gear & Pulley Co. v. ScholfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  2. State v. FettererSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  3. Wheeler v. ThomasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Doroszka v. LavineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. Amellin v. LeoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  3. Barbieri v. PandiscioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. King v. HaynesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. State Ex Rel. Klots Throwing Co. v. ValentineWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API