Legal Opinion
Epps v. Lindsey
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided March 27, 2017No. ACIAS 1600004PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.*
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Appellant Bruce Lindsey (Lindsey) appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents Joshua and Christina Epps (the Eppses). Lindsey and the Eppses are, respectively, the defendant and plaintiffs in the underlying unlawful detainer action which arose from the Eppses’ postfore-closure acquisition of the at-issue property.
The undisputed facts from below indicate Bank of America purchased the property during an April 2015 foreclosure sale. The property was security, under a deed of trust, for the repayment of a loan that was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Nativi v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Be v. Western Truck ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Riverside County Community Facilities District No. 87-1 v. Bainbridge 17California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Park Medical Pharmacy v. San Diego Orthopedic Associates Medical Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shetty v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2023