Legal Opinion

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington v. National Archives and Records Administration

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 8, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2020-0739Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) CITIZENS FOR RESPONSIBILITY ) AND ETHICS IN WASHINGTON et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-00739 (APM) ) NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ) ADMINISTRATION et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. In December 2019, Defendant National Archives and Records Administration (“NARA”) approved a schedule for disposing of certain records belonging to Defendant U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”). Plaintiffs 1 filed suit…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Home Box Office, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Professional Baseball, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API