Legal Opinion
In re Miller
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 18, 1900No. 2,027PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Bankruptcy.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
The petition herein was filed on the 22d day of December, 1899, and, the alleged bankrupts having answered, the issues were referred to Vernon E. Peckham, Esq., referee, to ascertain and report the facts. The referee has made report of the facts, and the matter now comes before the court upon the petitioners’ motion to confirm the referee’s report, and upon exceptions filed. The first act of bankruptcy alleged in the petition to have been committed herein by the respondents is under section 3a, subd. 3, by which it is provided that acts of bankruptcy by a person shall…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Columbus Electric Co. v. WordenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
- In re Rome Planing MillDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1899
- In re LangeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
- In re RadoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1872
- In re HendersonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1881
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re PutmanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1911
- In re TupperDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1908
- In Re Sunset Hill Holding Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- In re E. Del Pilar HermanosDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1916