Ladow v. State

Phipps, Judge.

Terri Ladow appeals her conviction for driving under the influence (DUI) to the extent it was less safe for her to drive, 1 contending that the trial court erred in admitting the results of her State-administered blood test because her request for an additional, independent blood test was not accommodated. The trial court’s decision to allow the evidence was based on its determination that Ladow did not request such a test. That determination was error. We therefore reverse Ladow’s DUI conviction.

The facts are undisputed. At approximately 2:15 a.m. on Febru ary 3, 2001, a law…