Legal Opinion

Young v. Amy

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 31, 1898No. 242PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

By section 17 of the act of Congress of July 16, 1894, c. 138, providing for the admission of Utah into the Union, 28 Stat. 107, c. 138, power was conferred upon the'convention, called for the purpose of framing a constitution for the contemplated State, to provide for a transfer of causes which might be pending in the territorial courts, at the time of the admission of Utah into the Union, to the courts of the State which were to be established. The statute moreover provided that “from all* judgments'and decrees of the Supreme Court of .the Territory mentioned, in this act, in any case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harrison v. PereaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Cheely v. ClaytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Amy v. AmyUtah Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Simms v. SimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. De La Rama v. De La RamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Crowe v. TrickeySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Luhrs v. HancockSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Rosaly v. Graham Y FrazerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API