Luhrs v. Hancock
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. The esse is stated in flie opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Me.. Justice McKeNná
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Arizona, affirming the judgment of the district court of the third judicial district of the Territory, rendered in an action of ejectment originally brought against Hancock and his wife, and to which action Pemberton was afterwards made a party.
The facts as found by the Supreme Court are as follows:
' “ This was an action by the appellant to recover possession of five certain lots in the city of Phoenix, and for the value of the rents and profits thereof. The complaint is in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harrison v. PereaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Jones v. CliftonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Miller v. SherrySupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Ingraham v. . BaldwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Stigers v. BrentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Lee v. KeechCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Christian Ex Rel. Von Holt v. Waialua Agricultural Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1931
- Hassey v. Williams, Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Shepler v. WhalenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Hernandez v. BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.