Legal Opinion

In Re McKesson HBOC, Inc. ERISA Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 9, 2005No. C-00-20030 RMWPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT AND (2) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT

[Re Docket Nos. 84, 100, 116, 118, 120, 122, 123, 124, 291, 320]

WHYTE, District Judge.

Christine Chang and James Huffman (“plaintiffs”), former participants in McKesson Corporation’s Profit-Sharing Investment Plan (“the Plan”), bring a class action lawsuit against multiple defendants for their alleged breaches of fiduciary-duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. Securities, Derivative, & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  2. Kirschbaum v. Reliant Energy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Peabody v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Tibble v. Edison InternationalDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
  5. Jones v. NovaStar Financial, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API