Legal Opinion

Blackman v. Edison

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn E. Cone, J.

In a mortgage foreclosure action the defendant owners of the mortgaged premises (hereinafter referred to as “defendant”) move for summary judgment dismissing the complaint under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Plaintiff cross-moves for summary judgment.

According to the allegations of the complaint, plaintiff exercised an option, a right accorded him under the mortgage terms, to accelerate payment of the principal balance upon default in the payment of two monthly installments of principal and interest which were due on June 1, 1961, and July 1, 1961, respectively.

Defendant alleges in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. 446 West 44th Street Inc. v. Riverland Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  2. Dale Holding Corp. v. Dale Gardens, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Eugenia M. Alessi, A/K/A Eugenia M. Nixon, and Thomas CroucherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. Bank of New England Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API