Legal Opinion

Youell v. Kridler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Kent. (Ádsit, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Plaintiff, being owner of a building, leased the same, by written lease, to Gerrit Vander Meulen, for one year, at a monthly rental of $83.33, payable in advance upon the first day of each and every month. Vander Meulen covenanted that he would not assign or transfer the lease, or sublet the premises, without the written assent of the plaintiff. The lease commenced June'3, 1893, Vander Meulen going into possession immediately. On June 19, 1893, he assigned the lease to Amberg & Bro. On July 13, Amberg & Bro. assigned to one Looey. Plaintiff claimed that both of these assignments were without…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Donkersley v. LevyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Logan v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1845

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. FeeneySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Drew v. Billings-Drew Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Michigan Lafayette Building Co. v. Continental BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API