Legal Opinion

Teich v. Kaufman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 25, 1912No. Gen. No. 18,686; Gen. No. 18,762PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the How. Charles A. McDonald, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barnes

Appellees, Teich and Boessler, filed a bill in equity against Nathan M. Kaufman, Samuel B. Kaufman, Congress Hotel Company, and Simeon Straus, praying for a preliminary and permanent injunction, the effect of which would be to enforce an agreement between said Kaufmans and appellees (therein and herein referred to as agreement B) and likewise one entered into between appellees and said Congress Hotel Company (therein and herein referred to as contract C). From the order granting a preliminary injunction on the filing and reading of the bill, the Kaufmans have appealed. After perfecting said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Guernsey v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. McNulta v. Corn Belt BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Woodruff v. WentworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  4. Estate of Ramsay v. WhitbeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Faulds v. YatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Galler v. GallerIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Schreiber v. CarneyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1982
  3. Smith v. California Thorn Cordage, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Fitzgerald v. ChristyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  5. Brady v. BeanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API