Krieger v. Krieger
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Jasen, J. (dissenting).
I dissent and vote to affirm. In my opinion the position of the majority, that laches prevents the plaintiff from prosecuting this declaratory judgment action, is incorrect.
We have held that laches will estop a party when he has unreasonably or inexcusably delayed asserting an equitable remedy and this delay has worked a disadvantage or injury upon his opponent. (Weiss v. Mayflower Doughnut Corp., 1 N Y 2d 310, 318; Marcus v. Village of Mamaroneck, 283 N. Y. 325, 332.) However, whether the delay was unreasonable or resulted in prejudice to the opponent is to be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marcus v. Village of MamaroneckNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Galway v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Treadwell v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Matter of LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Krakower v. KrakowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1943