Legal Opinion

Pacific Bioscience Laboratories, Inc. v. Pretika Corp.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 10, 2011No. Case C10-0231JLRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY

JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the court on Defendant Pretika Corporation’s (“Pretika”) motion to stay this litigation pending the ex parte reexamination of numerous claims of United States Patent No. 7,320,691 (“the '691 patent”) by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). (Mot. (Dkt. # 29) & Praecipe (Dkt. # 31).) The court has considered Pretika’s motion, all submissions filed in support and opposition to the motion, as well as the pleadings on file. The court also heard the argument of counsel on January 7,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ethicon, Inc. v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents & Trademarks and the United States Patent & Trademark OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Gould v. Control Laser Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Amado v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  4. Roblor Marketing Group, Inc. v. GPS Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS INC. v. Kohler Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2011
  2. Acres 4.0 v. IGTDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022
  3. ClearPlay v. Dish Network LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
  4. CyWee Group Ltd. v. HTC CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
  5. Dae Sung Hi Tech Co., LTD v. D&B Sales, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2025

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API