Legal Opinion
United States v. Ganley
District Court, D. Maine
Decided January 30, 2004No. 03-138-P-DMCPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 1
DAVID M. COHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The United States, on behalf of the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”), moves for summary judgment in this action seeking forfeiture resulting from an alleged violation of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 301. I grant the motion.
I. Summary Judgment Standard
Summary judgment is appropriate only if the record shows “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). “In…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Triangle Trading Co. v. Robroy Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Peninsula Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Alaska · 2004