Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Pittsburgh Steel Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 19, 1952No. Civ. 8343PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover unpaid overtime compensation and penalties under Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), based upon a period of employment from July 28, 1940 to September 30, 1945. On December 27, 1949 and prior to filing an answer to the complaint, the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., alleging that the plaintiff’s claim was barred, by Section 6 of the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 255. Subsequently, on June 11,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Hartmann v. Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Van Sant v. American Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Reynolds v. NeedleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Hartmann v. Time, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Labor v. Arco Chemical Company and Occupational Safety and Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- John H. Freeman, Jr., D/B/A Freeman Electric Gin Company v. Continental Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Wilt v. SmackDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Gladstein v. South Square AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- King & King Enterprises v. Champlin Petroleum Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.