Legal Opinion

Tye v. McFetridge

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 18, 2005No. 02-01738; A122013PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board (board) order in which the board calculated his temporary disability compensation by including a 15-week seasonal layoff. We review for errors of law, ORS 656.298(7), and reverse.

The facts are not in dispute. For 20 years, claimant has been a logger and mill worker. He works seasonally in Wallowa County. The work season is determined by the ground conditions for logging and when the local mill will begin accepting logs. Typically, he is off for about five months when the forests are too wet for logging. He began working for McFetridge…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. Board of ForestryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. SAIF Corp. v. FriasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Garcia v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tye v. McFetridgeOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Mossberg v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Phillips v. Department of Public Safety Standards & TrainingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Cisneros v. Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. Mossberg v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API