Legal Opinion

Scott v. Pierce

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 31, 1990No. C007061PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) revoked appellant’s driver’s license for two years for refusing to submit to an intoxication test. (Veh. Code, § 13353; hereafter section 13353.) In the administrative hearing the DMV relied upon the arresting officer’s sworn statement pursuant to section 13353. Although the officer had been subpoenaed by DMV, he did not appear at the hearing. After exhausting his administrative remedies, the appellant sought review in the trial court by administrative mandamus. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.) Exercising its independent judgment, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Berlinghieri v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Snelgrove v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Burkhart v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. MacKler v. AlexisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Dresser v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davenport v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Imachi v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Monaghan v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Delgado v. Cal. Dept. Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API