Legal Opinion

Saum v. Venick

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 1972No. 3866PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherer, P. J.

Plaintiff-appellant Gregory Saum, a minor, filed this action in the Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County by his father and next friend, against appellees, Isabelle B. Venick and Caryl Richards, Inc., seeking damages for personal injuries. Plaintiffs’ second amended petition alleges that at the request of Venick, Gregory Saum proceeded to remove a hair dryer from Venick’s automobile; that while so doing he loosened a set screw in the column of the dryer so that a tube therein would descend into the column and that as the result of the loosening of the screw, the tube, actuated by a spring,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Briere v. Lathrop Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Alfonso Linwood Carney v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  4. Winkler v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Mobberly v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Normali v. Cleveland Ass'n of Life UnderwritersOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Heartland of Urbana OH, L.L.C. v. McHugh Fuller Law Group, P.L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. American Centennial Insurance Co.Lucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API