State v. Nash
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, Judge.
{1} By statute, a defendant’s sentence for driving while intoxicated (DWI) will be enhanced upon proof of prior, valid convictions for DWI. The State appeals the district court’s ruling that it could not enhance Defendant James Nash’s sentence for DWI based on the invalidity of one of his prior convictions for DWI. The State argues that the district court erred for two reasons: (1) the district court considered an oral statement by Defendant’s attorney as evidence; and (2) Defendant is barred from collaterally attacking his ten-year old, prior conviction because his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. VarelaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. DeGraffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LeybaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- City of Las Cruces v. RogersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009
- Augustus v. Oregon State Board of NursingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. BueckerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.