Wiley v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Hendricks Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.
This was an indictment for murder. Plea, not guilty. Verdict, guilty of manslaughter; and sentence to the penitentiary.
The record shows that the regular panel of the jury having been exhausted without the election of a jury, and four jurors tales de circurnstantibus having been called, and accepted by the prisoner, the prosecuting attorney challenged them peremptorily, and his challenge was allowed by the Court—the prisoner objecting. This is the only error assigned.
The right of the state to make peremptory challenges depends upon our statutes. The 42d section of the practice act provides,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Beauchamp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1842
- Pryor v. HoskinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Pryor v. HoskinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002