Legal Opinion

Humphries v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 17, 1999No. 99-85CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SMITH, Chief Judge.

The court hereby GRANTS defendant’s Motion for More Definite Statement under RCFC 12(e), filed May 25, 1999, and ORDERS plaintiff to file a more definite statement of the court’s jurisdiction pursuant to the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2502(a)1 within 180 days.

As discussed most recently in Pottawatomi Nation in Canada v. United States, 27 Fed.Cl. 388 (1992), to maintain a suit against the United States an alien plaintiff must affirmatively demonstrate that citizens of the United States are accorded the reciprocal right to sue the alien’s sovereign in its courts. Id. at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nippon Hodo Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  2. Pottawatomi Nation in Canada v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mexican Intermodal Equipment S.A. de C.V. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. Ferreiro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. Ravi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API