Legal Opinion

Lo Vasco v. Lo Vasco

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1941No. Civ. 2766PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment of divorce.

The complaint alleged a cause of action based upoij extreme cruelty, including a specific reference to a number of particulars and circumstances. It was also alleged that certain property, consisting of a home, household furniture, some barber shop equipment and a balance due on a promissory note, was.community property. The defendant’s answer denied that there was any community property belonging to the parties and alleged that all of the property mentioned in the complaint was his separate property. He also filed a cross-complaint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Webster v. WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Estate of BoesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Strupelle v. StrupelleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  5. Mundt v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Leupe v. LeupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Wilson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Waters v. WatersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. MacKie v. MacKieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API