Carolyn Florimont v. Borough of Dalton
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
2Per curiam
Carolyn Florimonte appeals pro se from the District Court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. For the reasons set forth below, we will grant the Appellee’s motion and summarily affirm the judgment of the District Court.
I
This action is Florimonte’s tenth lawsuit over two drainage pipes that the Borough of Dalton installed on her property before she purchased it, and which allegedly discharged water that damaged her property. Florimonte filed the prior nine lawsuits in state court. In the first action, she obtained equitable relief, but no damages. Her next eight actions…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Michael Malik Allah v. Thomas SeiverlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Fletcher-Harlee Corp. v. Pote Concrete Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Anash, Inc. v. Borough of KingstonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Bruce v. City of Pittston, PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Carolyn Florimonte v. Borough of DaltonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Florimonte v. Borough of DaltonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025