Commonwealth v. Hopfer
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
FITZGERALD, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant, Timothy Hopfer, files this pro se appeal from the order of the Chester County Court of Common Pleas, dismissing as untimely his first petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA). 1 The PCRA court found all of his claims waived because his Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b) statement was untimely filed. Appellant has also filed a motion to amend and supplement statement of matters complained of on appeal. We hold that when an appellant timely files for an enlargement or extension of time within which to file his Rule 1925(b) statement, the trial…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. LeggettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. ScottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Com. v. Vo, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.