Legal Opinion
State v. Deaton
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 15, 2013No. SD 31913PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMary W. Sheffield, J.
Hershel Burns Deaton (“Defendant”) appeals his convictions for possession of chemicals with intent to manufacture a controlled substance and for possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. See § 195.420, RSMo (2000); *52§ 195.211, RSMo Cum.Supp. (2011). He argues the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence discovered during two searches of his vehicle and any testimony related to the searches of the vehicle. We disagree and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Standard of Review 1
“We review a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress in the light most…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
- State v. BerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of Missouri v. Kraig J. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- EDDIE WAYNE SMITH, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- State of Missouri v. Dennis W. Delapp, IIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019