Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Healey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1931No. 20376PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.

Lizzie Thomas, as plaintiff, brought this action in the district court of Seminole county against William J. Healey, as defendant, to recover an undivided one-half interest in the allotment of Watty, a full-blood Seminole Indian.

Plaintiff contends that she was the lawful wife of Watty at the time of -his death and was entitled to inherit an undivided one-half interest in h'is allotment. Plaintiff obtained judgment against defendant by default on the 29th day of March, 192S. This judgment was vacated on the 1st day of August, 1928, on the motion of defendant on the ground that it was void on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Buck v. BransonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Lamme v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Unussee v. McKinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Hayes v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barrett v. BarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API