Legal Opinion

State v. Reinke

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 1973No. 43315PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from a conviction for aggravated forgery in violation of Minn. St. 609.625, subds. 1(1) and 3. He seeks to withdraw his guilty plea because there is no affirmative showing in the record that he understood the meaning of § 609.05, which deals with the criminal liability of one who intentionally aids another in the commission of a crime. This contention is without merit. It is presumed that counsel adequately informed his client of the nature and elements of the offense, including the meaning of Minn. St. 609.05. State v. Dickson, 294 Minn. 459, 199 N. W. 2d 423 (1972); State…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. FeatherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. State v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. State v. DicksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. PropotnikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API