Legal Opinion

State v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 19, 1997No. 96-612PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVORATO, Justice.

A jury convicted Thomas A. Gordon of assault causing bodily injury, a serious misdemeanor. In his appeal Gordon challenges an instruction defining bodily injury to include any impairment of physical condition. The instruction goes on to say that a red mark or bruise on the skin is such an impairment and is therefore a bodily injury.

The instruction raises the following issue: Does a red mark or bruise constitute a per se impairment of physical condition? We answer that a red mark or bruise is not a per se impairment of physical condition. We conclude the instruction was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McKeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Hildreth v. Iowa Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  3. State v. HubbardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. State v. LuppesCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1984

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. State v. HallockCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2009
  3. State v. CanasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. United States v. Tyrone ParrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  5. State v. MeschSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API