Legal Opinion

Behm v. Behm

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1988No. Civ. 870387PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

Roger Behm appealed a decree of divorce from Frances Behm, arguing that the trial court erred in awarding spousal support, in valuing certain property, and in dividing a profit-sharing fund and inherited property. We affirm.

Roger and Frances married in 1966 and divorced in 1987, when their three children, Steve, Michelle, and Nicholas, were ages 19, 12, and 7.

After they were married, Frances worked outside of the home and taught until 1974. Thereafter, she was a homemaker.

Roger worked part time and completed his college degree during the first two years of the marriage. Then…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Briese v. BrieseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bagan v. BaganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Winter v. WinterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Wheeler v. WheelerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dick v. DickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kautzman v. KautzmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Van Oosting v. Van OostingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Olson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Roen v. RoenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Young v. YoungNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API