Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Menasha Corp.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2008No. 2004AP3239PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1ConcurrenceN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 109. {concurring). While I join the majority opinion, I write separately to emphasize that resolving the issue of deference is key to a correct decision in this case. Rules regarding deference are important limits that respect the different roles of the branches of government. Granting the appropriate level of deference to the Commission's interpretation of Wis. Admin. Code § Tax 11.71(l)(e) and (k)1 *643and Wis. Stat. § 77.51(20),2 I concur that the Commission's decision should be upheld.

¶ 110. The threshold question on the issue of deference is whether it is the DOR's interpretation or the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. DaimlerChrysler v. Labor and Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Caterpillar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Menasha Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Menasha Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API