Winston v. General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers Local Union No. 89
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF- FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
RUSSELL, District Judge.
I
1. The parties to this proceeding, the Defendants, Dallas & Mavis Forwarding Company (D & M), and General Drivers, Ware-housemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 89 (Local 89), are parties to a national multiemployer, multi-union collective bargaining agreement known as the National Master Automobile Transporters Agreement (Agreement), which expires May 21, 1995.
2. Pursuant to that arbitration process, on December 12, 1990, an arbitration panel rendered a decision requiring D & M to merge or “dovetail” its Kentucky Truck Plant (KTP)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Buffalo Forge Co. v. United SteelworkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pipkin v. JVM Operating, L.C.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1996