Legal Opinion

Barnard v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 29, 1893PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Cane 44 — INDICTMENT 'The court should- have instructed the jury as to the offenfe of assault and battery, that offense being .included in the one charged in the indictment. (Criminal Code, secs. 262, 264.) "Under the Code of Practice, the offense of assault and battery is not a degree of the offense of assault with intent to rob. (Criminal Code, sec. 265.).

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bennett

The appellant Barnard was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of assaulting Patrick D. Casey -with intent to rob him. The court, upon the trial of the case, instructed the jury correctly as to the crime of an “assault with intent to- rob;” but the appellant contends as the offense of a common assault and battery, a mere breach of the peace, is a degree of the crime of an “assault with intent to "rob,” 'and is included in that charge, that thé court, the evidence authorizing it, should have instructed ‘the jury that they might find him guilty of' the misdemeanor. There was some evidence…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Housman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Southerland, Lawson Vaughn v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  3. Little v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Runyon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  5. Murphy v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API