Legal Opinion
Coley v. Bowser
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 22, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-2182Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DIONTE COLEY, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 20-2182 (CKK) MURIEL BOWSER, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION (April 22, 2021) Dionte Coley (“Plaintiff”) has filed a civil action against Muriel Bowser, Peter Newsham, Karl Racine, Christopher Geldart, Laquandra Nesbitt, and Wayne Turnage (collectively, the “Moving Defendants”), as well as “Four Unidentified Metropolitan Police Officers” and “At Least Three Unidentified Department of Public Works Employees,” (collectively, with the “Moving Defendants,” “Defendants”). Plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.