United States v. Lower
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLETCHER, Judge:
This granted issue compels us to consider “[w]hether a harsher sentence than that originally approved by the convening authority can be [effectively] imposed by [direction] of the supervisory authority.” We have no doubt about the occasional need for correction of ambiguities in a convening authority’s action or of the supervisory authority’s power to dictate a clarification pursuant to paragraph 95, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition). But in this instance, the substitute convening authority failed to indicate by any means what…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. BuntingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. LoftUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. GosserCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. HaynesU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
- United States v. McIntoshU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.