Legal Opinion
Cocke v. Conquest
Texas Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1931No. 5151PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Commissioner SHORT
delivered the opinion of the court.
The plaintiff in error, Emmett B. Cocke, has sought to appropriate to the satisfaction of a judgment, originally amounting to $6,300 against Lee Conquest, and reduced by the sale of the tract of land on which a vendors lien was foreclosed to about $4,000, besides interest, 188.4 acres of land situated in Hidalgo county, found by the court to be the homestead of the defendants in error, Lee and Minnie Conquest, husband and wife respectively, residents of Hidalgo county and citizens of Texas, which Lee and Minnie Conquest assert to have…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Woods v. Alvarado State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1929
- Hargadene, McKittrick & Co. v. WhitfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Brooks v. ChathamTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Herman Iken & Co. v. OlenickTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Medlenka v. DowningTexas Supreme Court · 1883
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- INWOOD NORTH HOMEOWNERS'ASS'N v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- In the Matter of Kelly P. Bradley, Debtor. Kelly P. Bradley v. Pacific Southwest Bank, FsbCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Doody v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Rancho Oil Co. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Wallace v. First National Bank of ParisTexas Supreme Court · 1931
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.